Warning!
This article contains biblical quotes about women doing graphical fornication with their "lovers". Viewer's discretion is advised!
This article also contains graphical language! It is quoted right from the gospel of porn (bible) and elaborated by me.
This whole article is not really appropriate for religious readers, young ones and women! But I really have no choice, because I got all of the graphical pornography right out of the gospel of porn, and I am here to demolish its falsehood.
Note:
None of the Biblical garbage below was written by GOD Almighty. It was written by a pornography-loving drunkard who attributed his filth to GOD Almighty. Allah Almighty Said in the Noble Quran:
"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book (i.e., the Bible), but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-78)"
By the way, GOD Almighty's
original Name in the original Bible was indeed "Allah" or "Elaw".
Jesus in the Aramaic NT addressed Him as "Elaw". See the proof!
My rebuttal to Shamoun's and Katz' "Osama's Dirty Lies" absurd and self-refuting article:
This article is a refutation to Sam Shamoun's and Jochen Katz' absurd article that is located at: http://www.answering-islam.org/Responses/Osama/dirty_lies.htm. The reader will shortly see, how these two jokers have proven the filth and sick pornography in their gospel of porn; the book of women's vaginas and breasts taste like "wine".
The reader will shortly see how I am so thankful to the two of them for admitting that their bible is indeed a sick book!
Some Jews and Christians claim that the praised graphical pornography in the Bible is actually a conversation between a husband and his wife. They know well that claiming otherwise would bring total shame to the gospel of porn, because of the (literally) x-rated and low-life graphical pornography. There is ample evidence that prove their claim to be bogus and desperate. Let us look at this example from the many below:
Song of Songs 8:1-3 "If only you were to me like a brother, who was nursed at my mother's breasts! Then, if I found you outside, I would kiss you, and no one would despise me. I would lead you and bring you to my mother's house-- she who has taught me. I would give you spiced wine to drink [i.e., her vagina's semen!], the nectar of my pomegranates. His left arm is under my head and his right arm embraces me."
She wished if he was her brother so that she wouldn't have to take him home in secret. Now if he was truly her husband, then what would prompt her to wish that he was her brother? Were husbands back then not allowed to live with their wives? If so, how did they then consummate and have children and raise generations and societies? Were they allowed to live with each others for a while?
The obvious answer, that only the ashamed people from the Jews and Christians would deny, is that the "lover" was NOT her husband, and she was not his wife.
Further more, according to "Sex in the Bible" documentary film, the two were "a maiden (virgin) and her lover" and not
husband and wife. Listen to this for yourself.
"maiden" means virgin; an unmarried woman; a single
girl, etc...
From http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=maiden%20:
maid·en
n.
The bottom line is:
The graphical pornography in the gospel of porn (the bible) is quite
devastating and unjustifiable. The book's followers have to literally resort to
lying in order to minimize the moral damage and denigration that this corrupt book
teaches and causes.
They wrote:
Osama's Dirty Lies
Trying so desperately to hit below the belt ...
Osama Abdallah announced the following on his site:
07/21/2005- I added an audio file that I captured from the documentary film, "Sex in the Bible", that proves from the Hebrew language experts' commentaries that the Bible did say that women's vaginas taste like "wine", to the article X-Rated Pornography in the Bible. This will silence all of the noise and the intentional and unethical accusations that were made by Sam Shamoun and Quennel Gale of the "Answering Islam" team regarding me being a "liar". They knew I was telling the Truth, but they tried to play deceptive games with the reader. Now the game is over, and their questionable ethics are exposed. (Source)
Eager to find out how Osama "silenced" us this time, we listened to the audio clip. What did we find? After citing the specific text so often abused by Osama (see our earlier rebuttal), the female narrator comments:
... But when we look closely at the Hebrew, we find out that the anatomy that he is describing MAY BE in fact a bit lower than the belly button.
That's it. The audio clip trumpeted by Osama contains a claim. Wow! No proof. No reasoning. No evidence to support the claim. Simply a claim.
Will anyone in his right mind believe that this is to be counted as the evidence supporting Osama’s perverted interpretations? This is merely the speculation of an unnamed commentator who says that the Hebrew MAY BE speaking of something a bit lower than the belly button. Again: What is her proof?
My response:
Notice, first of all, how the cowards unlinked both my X-Rated Pornography in the Bible article and the audio file. They know well that if the reader reads and/or listens to my evidence, then the facts and the Truth would become irrefutable and crystal clear to him/her. What they did instead was minimize the reader's access to my sources so that they can build their false perception on him.
This team of clowns, especially Sam Shamoun, are notorious in doing this. I have raised this issue in a number of my rebuttals already before [1] [2] [3] [4], etc... Notice how he purposely unlinked the links that I provided for the reader for further evidence and proofs.
Notice their lie: "This is merely the speculation of an unnamed commentator who says that the Hebrew MAY BE speaking of something a bit lower than the belly button. Again: What is her proof?"
Only you liars say she was unnamed!
I did put in the article, which you purposely unlinked, the reference to the Theology Professor that mentioned this. Here is her info that was displayed on TV:
Carole Fountaine
Professor of Biblical Studies
Andover-Newton Theological School
This what was displayed on the screen of the documentary film. So not only you
invented a new lie by saying she is "unnamed", but you also denied the fact
that:
The "we" here is Carole Fountaine and her team of department of theologians!
The "we" here of course includes everyone from the audience, but to be more specific, it includes her team of theologians, because they did the research and studied the Hebrew and discovered the pornography in this pornographic verse.
The lady smiled when she said that. This proves:
(a)- She didn't want to be graphic by saying vagina!
(b)- The word "may be" that the two weasels purposely misinterpreted, is actually a CONFIRMATION and not a doubt! She was trying to be polite and proper in her words. Plus the words "may be" are commonly used in our everyday language, and we do sometimes use them as confirmations.
(c)- If one listens to her voice tone in the audio file, then he/she will see it clearly.
"May be you ought to do this!" is another way of saying "You should really do this!"
It's a confirmation and not a doubt!
Thank you for admitting that your pornographic bible is trash!
(here is how you did it)The two weasels have charged me of being a liar and a pervert, despite all of the proofs that they already knew above, for simply brining a quote from their
gospel of porn. This obviously proves the following: 1- They fully recognize the danger of pornography in their gospel of porn. 2- They fully realize that such pornography only proves that their bible is trash, or at least contains trash. 3- Them conveniently and falsely lashing back at me only caused them to shoot themselves in the foot, because they're basically now saying the following: (a)- Osama Abdallah is a pervert and a liar for inserting such sick lies and porn into our "Holy Bible". (b)- Such sick pornography can not exist in our "Holy Book" (c)- Osama is desperate (as ironically their title says) and he is hopelessly trying to prove the lie of pornography in the Bible.
Well too bad for the weasels, Osama Abdallah is neither desperate, nor did he invent any lie against the
gospel of porn. Osama Abdallah simply quoted the the Professor who was representing the Andover-Newton Theological School's Theology Department.So to accuse me of being a liar is basically accusing them of being liars also. And I don't think anyone would take two weasels' and real liars' words over professionals in theology who know far more about Hebrew than them.
Checkmate!
They wrote:
Where is the lexical data supporting her claim?
My response:
I think the Professors of that university have done the this job already. See the text of your gospel of porn for more details.
They wrote:
What sources did she quote to prove her assertion? Absolutely nothing. After all is said and done, Osama is not even a millimeter closer to giving evidence for the perverted interpretation of the text that has become his obsession.
My response:
I love it when you say "perverted interpretation". Keep attacking me, because these are more bullets that you keep shooting yourself with in the foot, as I clearly demonstrated.
They wrote:
Yet, unlike Osama, we do not have to twist the Quran to find evidence for Allah's fascination with women's anatomies since he refers to their breasts and vaginal areas:
"Surely for the godfearing awaits a place of security, gardens and vineyards, and maidens of SWELLING BREASTS (Arabic- kawa'ib), like of age, and a cup overflowing." S. 78:33 Arberry (see also Dawood, Rodwell)
And (remember) her who guarded her SEXUAL ORGAN (Arabic- farjahaa): We breathed into her from Our Spirit, and We made her and her son a Sign for all people. S. 21:91
And Mary the daughter of 'Imran, who guarded her SEXUAL ORGAN (Arabic- farjahaa) and We breathed INTO IT of Our spirit; and she testified to the truth of the words of her Lord and of His revelations, and was one of the devout (servants). S. 66:12
In the Arabic there is no need to speculate that this may be a euphemistic way of referring to something "a bit lower than the belly button". There is no maybe here. It is an absolutely clear and unambiguous word for the sexual organ.
For the evidence from various sources, including Muslim commentators and scholars, demonstrating that the word farj means the vagina in these specific contexts please consult the article, The Birth Narratives of Jesus in the Quran.
If mentioning the vagina explicitly or implicitly is disqualifying a text from being revelation from God, then the Qur'an is clearly not from God. If this is not a valid criterion, then what is Osama's point? If Osama thinks that mentioning the vagina in any book makes it a text of sexual perversion (and Osama has still not proven that it even is in the Bible), then it is Osama's god and his prophet who are the perverts for producing such sexually explicit texts.
My response:
First of all, even in your twisted translation above, the reader clearly sees that there is ABSOLUTELY no pornographic in any of the Noble Verses above! A person doesn't have to be over 18 with viewer discretion is advised to read the Noble Quran as it is the case with your gospel of porn.
Mary Guarded her chastity, not her literal "vagina"!
Notice that for Noble Verses 21:91 and 66:12, the liars did not specify the translation source. This is because they are the liars who twisted the meaning of the Arabic word "Farj", which means the woman's womb, and also means woman's chastity.
Mary guarded her "chastity" not her vagina in Noble Verse 21:91 above! She was GOD-fearing and a virgin chaste woman. That's what the Noble Verse is saying.
"Mah'bal" in Arabic is the exact word for "vagina" or "sexual organ" as the liars put it.
Where in the Noble Quran was the word "mah'bal" used?
If this is all you can come up with, then you are soundly and hopelessly losing your
battle with me tonight. If Allah Almighty's Divine Claim about the Virgin Mary getting pregnant even though
she was never touched by any man is pornography to you, then you are not only weasels, but
you are total goofs!
You might have a little bit stronger position with the
"big breasted" maidens in Paradise point, but again, nothing pornographic about this. Allah Almighty never Said that they shall suck the males' penis as the gospel of porn says (see the verses below), and ejaculate semen (as the christian horny whores most of them lose their virginities to their boyfriends without marriage, and they wear bikinis where they expose 99% of their cheap and unchaste bodies to the public do today) with a never-tasted before, wine-tasting semen.Show me where in the Noble Quran does it say anything like this.
Here is what the gospel of porn metaphorically says about penis-sucking:
Song of Songs 1:2-4 "Let him kiss me with the kisses of his mouth-- for your love is more delightful than wine. Pleasing is the fragrance of your perfumes; your name is like perfume poured out. No wonder the maidens love you! Take me away with you--let us hurry! Let the king bring me into his chambers. We rejoice and delight in you; we will praise your love (i.e., semen) more than wine. How right they are to adore you! "
Proverbs 7:18 "Come, let's drink (i.e., drink and swallow semen that is) deep of love till morning; let's enjoy ourselves with love!"
Song of Songs 5:4 "I slept but my heart was awake. Listen! My lover is knocking: 'Open to me, my sister, my darling, my dove, my flawless one. My head is drenched with dew, my hair with the dampness of the night.' I have taken off my robe (i.e., he showed his penis to her. Underwears didn't exist back then!) must I put it on again? I have washed my feet, must I soil them again? My lover thrust his hand through the latch-opening; my heart began to pound for him."
My answer to him: What kind of garbage is that?!
She wants him to taste her sexual organ!
Song of Songs 8:1-3 "If only you were to me like a brother, who was nursed at my mother's breasts! Then, if I found you outside, I would kiss you, and no one would despise me. I would lead you and bring you to my mother's house-- she who has taught me. I would give you spiced wine to drink [i.e., her vagina's semen!], the nectar of my pomegranates. His left arm is under my head and his right arm embraces me."
Now I know the two weasels might say that I am inventing a lie here by saying "vagina's semen". The point here is not whether I am lying or not, because from the text it is quite both possible and probable that this is exactly what it means, but rather, the point here is that the gospel of porn is promoting for sisters who have very attractive brothers to try to sleep with them! That by itself is more than sufficient, because when the brother and sister, or the lover and his whore have biblical sex, it is obvious that he will be playing around with her vagina and her playing around with his penis!
Sisters can covet and sleep with their biological brothers!
That's the moral of the story here!
Another AUDIO FILE of her and her "lover" having sex in the field.
My advise to all of the gospel-of-porn following girls out there:
If you have a very attractive and sexy brother; a super-model brother that is, for GOD Almighty's sake!!, if you believe in Him and fear Him, do not follow the blasphemous gospel of porn's advise and to try to sleep with him in bed!! OK?
Again, it wasn't GOD Almighty who wrote this garbage above! It was a blasphemous drunkard who attributed it to GOD Almighty. Allah Almighty Said in the Noble Quran:
"Know they not Allah Knoweth what they conceal and what they reveal? And there are among them illiterates, who know not the Book (i.e., the Bible), but (see therein their own) desires, and they do nothing but conjecture. Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say: 'This is from Allah,' To traffic with it for a miserable price! Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby. (The Noble Quran, 2:77-78)"
By the way, GOD Almighty's
original Name in the original Bible was indeed "Allah" or "Elaw".
Jesus in the Aramaic NT addressed Him as "Elaw". See the proof!
"Allah" in Arabic means "The Supreme GOD Who is above all gods."
Another Checkmate!
They wrote:
My response:
I just find it very cute that they both signed their names, right next to each others, when they wrote their pornographic article. LOOLLLL :-).
Back to My Rebuttals, and exposing the lies of the Answering Islam team section.
Rebuttals to Sam Shamoun's Articles section.
Rebuttals to Jochen Katz' Articles section.
Contradictions and History of Corruption in the Bible.
Questions about Jesus that trinitarian Christians don't have logical answers for.
What parts of the Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth? and Why?
"Allah" was GOD Almighty's original Name in the Bible according to the Hebrew and Aramaic sources.
Scientific Miracles in Islam and the Noble Quran.
Most of the Bible's books and gospels were written by mysterious people!
Jesus mentioned Muhammad by the name in the Bible.
Did Isaiah 53 really prophesies about the crucifixion of Jesus? It supports Islam's claims about Jesus peace be upon him never died on the cross. I also addressed John 19:36-37 from the Bible and proved that Jesus never got crucified, since GOD Almighty promised that he will protect Jesus' body and not let even a single bone be broken. My question to all Christians is: How in the world is it possible for the feet to get nailed on the cross without any penetration to the bones by the nails, hence breaking part of the feet's bones?! I also added refutations to Exodus 12:46, Numbers 9:12, Zechariah 12:10 and Psalm 34:20, which supposedly prove the Christians' belief about Jesus crucifixion. I proved that this dogma has no truth what so ever and exposed the wrong Trinitarian English translation of Zechariah 12:10.