Ousman Ahmad
What are the chances for one DNA to form from ape to human? This is a relevant question we need to ask ourselves. The evolutionists and other supporters of this theory will claim that there is about a 96% resemblance between humans and the apes. Let us read what a well notes encyclopaedia (Wikipedia) says:
"For example, these DNA sequence comparisons have revealed that humans and chimpanzees share 96% of their genomes and analyzing the few areas where they differ helps shed light on when the common ancestor of these species existed."
Therefore, they would conclude that because of the sticking similarities between the DNA of both humans and apes, that we evolved from the apes. But now, let us hear what a PhD of the name: Dr. Kathleen Campbell has to say about this:
"The sequencing of the chimpanzee genome is a tremendous accomplishment, but what we are seeing here is a scientific shell game," says Dr. Rana. "Researchers are manipulating the outcomes to try and show more similarities between chimps and humans than are actually there by focusing on a single type of genetic difference. When scientists take into account all the types of genetic differences and do a more global comparison, the similarities drop from 96% to about 85%."
Source: http://www.scce-news.com/ChimpGenomeProject.html
So, 96% isn't as what people claim it to be. Not only that, but fanatics make the assertion that it is not 96%, it is 99%! This isn't the case at all, since comparison of DNA with a closer look shows us that between 85%-90%, the genes match. To claim it is 99% is what a fanatic would say. But even if we agree (for sake of argument) that it is 96%-99%, is it probable that a single gene can form from ape to human being by chance? Let us see:
The genetic material of the human being which is the gene which decides what creature we have, contains 6 billion (6,000,000,000) nucleotides inside the nucleus in each cell, arranged in specific sequences and specific quantities. Now, what is the probability of a single specific sequence of the nucleotides to be arranged by chance? Let us give an example, to help us understand how we can work this out.
For example, we have 5 cubes each one numbered 1, 2, 3, 4 or 5. If we throw these cubes up in the air simultaneously, and let them fall into a guided straight line, the probability laws tell us the number of possible combinations we can get is 120 combinations. What is the mathematical law for this? Well, since there are 5 cubes, the equation is: 1x2x3x4x5=120. So, the chances that at random, these 5 cubes after being thrown into the air simultaneously and landing in a guided straight line, of numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 is: 1/120 which is 0.0086.
If there were 6 cubes, the probability diminishes fast when we increase the number of cubes. So, if we did the same thing with a 6th cube, the different combinations which we can get by throwing the 6 cubes once simultaneously, and letting them fall in a guided line, is: 1x2x3x4x5x6=720 which is: 1/720 which is: 0.00138. So, just by increasing the number of cubes by an extra 1, the chances change from 1/120 to 1/720. The chances change from: 0.0086 to 0.00138. If we work with 84 cubes, mathematics tell us the chances of getting a single specific combination, by tossing 84 cubes once simultaneously, and letting them fall in a guided line, is: 1x2x3x4x5x6x7x8x9x10 etc, and this goes on all the way to 84. The chances in mathematics with 84 cubes is 1 in 10 raised to 50 (1 out of 10000 etc with 50 zero's). This is negligible which means that chance is so small that it can be ignored (neglected) when studying the larger effect. Mathematics tell us anything 1 out of 10 raised to 50 or larger, is counted as zero.
So, the genetic material of the human being which is the gene which decides what creature we have, each genetic material contains 6 billion (6,000,000,000) nucleotides, arranged in specific sequences and specific quantities which enable the genetic materiel to function. Now, if there were 84 nucleotides in each genetic material lined in a specific sequence and specific quantity, the chances would be negligible (zero). But, there are not 84 nucleotides in each genetic material, not even 100, nor 1000, not even a million. There are 6 billion nucleotides (*) which are lined up in specific sequences in specific quantities. The chances that these 6 billion nucleotides could have been lined up in the specific sequences for the genetic material to function by chance, is: 1 in 10 raised to 3,571,428,571 .
The calculation: since 84 genes would equal: 1 out of 10 raised to 50, the equation is:
6,000,000,000 divided by 84= 71428571.4285714285714288571
So, the above number shows how many 84's there are in 6 billion. Next, you need to multiply this by 50, to get the chances:
71428571.4285714285714288571 X 50 = 3,571,428,571 (Rounded to the nearest whole number). So, chances for 1 DNA genetic material to form in specific sequences, in which it is the EXACT same from ape to human is: 1 in 10 raised to 3,571,428,571. Even if the similarity was 99% between monkey's gene and human being's gene, we are still talking about 6,000,000,000 nucleotides that must be haphazardly re-arranged to change the monkey into a human. The probability laws preclude this as an utter impossibility. ONLY 1 human gene contains 6,000,00,000 nucleotides.
Do you know what this means? The chances is 1 out of 1,000,000,000 etc with 3,571,428,571 zeros after that. Mathematics tell us that anything 1 out of 1,000,000,000 etc with 50 zeros in total, is negligible and equals zero. By the way, this is the chance for only ONE gene to be arranged an random, in a specific sequence. There are about 30,000 genes (*) in a human being, so imagine the chances for each pair of the 6 billion nucleotides in each of the 30,000 genes being arranged in a specific order, by chance. There is no chance at all, for a single gene to "by chance" form nucleotides in a specific sequence which would allow it to function properly, leave aside 30,000 genes, proving that there is no chance for an ape to have haphazardly evolved from ape to human, because it is improbable to a state of negligibility.
للمزيد من مواضيعي