Paul nullified and contradicted the point of Baptism.
Him calling the
disbelievers, who are supposed to be doomed to Hell, as "sanctified" and "holy" is clear nonsense and stupidity, and further proves
with CLEAR-CUT proofs that his words were not Revelations from GOD Almighty. It also contradicts
GOD Almighty's verdict about them in the Old Testament.
Introduction:
We must first of all know that the entire Bible is corrupted and unreliable
and is mostly filled with man-made laws and corruption! "`How
can you say, "We [the Jews] are wise, for we have the law of the LORD," when
actually the lying pen of the scribes has handled it falsely?' (From
the NIV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"
The Revised Standard Version makes it even clearer: "How can you say, 'We are wise, and the law of the LORD is with us'? But,
behold, the false pen of the scribes has made it into a lie. (From the RSV Bible, Jeremiah 8:8)"
In either translation, we clearly see that the
Jews had so much corrupted the Bible with their man-made cultural laws, that they had turned
the Bible into a lie!
See Also Deuteronomy
31:25-29 where Moses peace be upon him predicted the
corruption/tampering of the Law (Bible) after his death.
The Book of Moses predicted that the Law (Bible) will
get corrupted. The Book of Jeremiah which came approximately 826 years after did indeed
confirm this corruption.
Contradictions and proofs of Historical Corruptions
in the Bible:
The sub sections here are:
1- Historical proofs of the Bible's corruption. Also includes detailed refutations and exposing of Paul's
lies. 2- False claims and clear contradictions.
3- Textual variants, and Abrogation (GOD supposedly changing His Mind) in the
Bible.
4- What parts of the
Bible do Muslims believe are closest to the Truth, and Why?
5- Other Corruptions and Topics.
6- Muslim Rebuttals.
7- The Bible's "original manuscripts had been lost"
according to the Christian scholars and theologians.
For sub-section #7 above:
They openly admit that the Bible is corrupt, and the original manuscripts
had been lost.
1- Historical proofs of the Bible's corruption:
Just who were the real authors of the Bible? Today's Books and Gospels' authors of the Bible are UNKNOWN. See the
comments from the NIV Bible itself!Also includes detailed refutations and exposing of Paul's
lies. See Paul's section in the article. It also includes proofs
about the New Testament was written in the 3rd century by
Constantine and his church by their own
words. It wasn't written by Jesus and his original Disciples.
History of man's corruption in the Bible.Located in section #2 in the link. The
section has tons of historical events and details backed by quotes from major scholars, books
and historians who used to be Biblical Theologians that expose the historical corruption of
the Bible.
The early Christians
rejected Trinity.Early Christians had major problems and
disagreements about who truly Jesus was and whether or not he got crucified or not.
Jesus the "Alpha and Omega". Not only this quote doesn't prove Jesus as GOD, but it was also written in a
book that is unreliable in later bibles. In the
original Bibles, the quote doesn't even exist!!
Arche of the Creation of God
as Alpha and Omega. The "Alpha and
Omega" doesn't even exist in the original Bibles! It's a lie that
was later inserted by trinitarians. See the historical proofs in the article. If
their site is down, then you can read the article at this link ON MY SITE.
The Bible's English translations are all different and
corrupted. See how the Bible
translators are not truthful. They add their personal words, thoughts and
interpretations as if they were GOD Almighty's Holy Words. This resulted in
having hundreds of English-translated Bibles considerably differing with each others in the
translations and in issues that are very serious and are relevant even to the central faith of
Christianity.
The Bible says: The earth is flat! The Bible claims that the
Earth is flat and never moves! It also claims that the Sun hurries back to where it
rises!
Some Christians decided to respond to many of the Bible's contradictions. They
named their site "101
Clear Contradictions in the Bible."Ironically, their own quotes below
refute them! For example, you can do a search on this text in their site: "Confirmation of this type of copyist error is found in various pagan
writers as well." Even those Christian scholars admit with their own typed words by their own
fingers that the Bible does indeed contain "copyist error(s)", and they lowered
their Holy Scripture to the level of a pagan book through their comparison. My question
is then, how can it be the word of GOD when it contains Satanic "copyist errors"?
The Original manuscript don't even exist
according to the bible's own theologians!
"Christians readily admit, however, that there have been
'scribal errors' in the copies of the Old and New Testament. It is beyond the capability of
anyone to avoid any and every slip of the pen in copying page after page from any book, sacred
or secular. Yet we may be sure that the original manuscript (better known as autograph) of
each book of the Bible, being directly inspired by God, was free from all error.Those
originals, however, because of the
early date of their inception no longer exist."
"Because we are dealing with accounts which were written
thousands of years ago, we would not expect to
have the originals in our possession today, as they would
have disintegrated long ago. We are therefore dependent on the copies taken from
copies of those originals, which were in turn continually copied out over a period of
centuries. Those who did the copying were prone to making two types of scribal errors. One
concerned the spelling of proper names, and the other had to do with numbers."
"Most Christians will affirm that the Bible is our rule of faith
and practice. It is a little self contradictory to stand in the pulpit and say the word of God
is inspired, when in his heart the pastor knows he is not referring to any book
here on this earth that people can hold in their hands and believe. He really should say what he believes - that the word of God WAS
inspired at one time but we no longer have it, so
the best we can do is hope we have a close approximation of what God probably meant to tell
us." (http://www.geocities.com/brandplucked/transinsp.html)
"It also seems a bit inconsistent to say he believes
the originals were inspired, when he has never seen them, they never were
together in one single book and they no longer exist anyway. How does he know they were
inspired? He accepts this by faith. Yet he seems to lack the faith to actually believe that
God could do exactly what He said He would do with His words. God said He would preserve them
and that heaven and earth would pass away but His words would not pass away." (http://www.geocities.com/brandplucked/transinsp.html)
Yet, this same person writes:
"How Old Was Ahaziah, 22 or 42?
This is an apparent contradiction that frequently is thrown in the
face of Christians who believe we have an inspired Bible. Many Atheist, Islam and Bible
dubunker sites bring up this example. Sad to say, most of the “Christian”
apologetic sites which promote the new bible versions cave in here and say the number 42 is a
copyist error.
Here is a typical response by those Christians who use and promote
the modern versions. This one comes from Techtonics Apologetics. This “defender of the
faith” answers: “ Was Ahaziah forty-two or twenty-two (per 2 Kings 8:26) when he
ascended the throne? More likely 22, and 2 Chronicles has been hit by a copyist error. See our
foundational essay on copyist errors for general background. In favor of the "22"
reading in 2 Chronicles: The 2 Kings reading; some LXX and Syriac manuscripts.
This typical Christian response is not limited to this one example,
but in many objections brought up by the infidels or the curious, this same rote answer is
given. There is a copyist error. There is a typo in God’s book. The skeptics
laugh and the modern version proponent looks like a fool.
2 Chronicles 22:2 tells us that Ahaziah was 42 years old when he
began to reign. The Hebrew texts, plus Wycliffe 1395,Coverdale 1535, Bishop's Bible 1568,
Geneva Bible 1599, the Revised Version, the American Standard Version, Douay 1950, the Spanish
Reina Valera 1960, Italian Diodati 1602, NKJV, RSV, NRSV, the Jewish translations of 1917 and
1936, the 1998 Complete Jewish Bible, Hebrew Names Bible, Rotherham's Emphasized Bible,
Webster's 1833 translation, the New English Bible 1970, the New Jerusalem, KJV 21st Century,
and the Third Millenium Bible all say Ahaziah was 42 years old when he began to reign.
The inspired
Hebrew text clearly says Ahaziah was 42 years old. The masoretic scribes were
very scrupulous in copying their sacred trust. No word or number was written from memory but
each word was carefully checked before he recopied it. The copies were checked and checked
again and if there were a single error, the whole was discarded and and new one
begun......" (http://www.geocities.com/brandplucked/22or42.html)
My Response:
How do you know that the above references (written by ordinary men) that
you used in proving that Ahaziah was 42 years old are correct when the original manuscripts
had been lost? What makes you be so sure that Ahaziah was indeed 42 years old and not 22
or any other age? You said the Christians make themselves look like "fools"
when they attempt to answer away the apparent and irrefutable errors in the Bible. Didn't
you too just make an utter fool out of yourself too?
Face it and admit it! The Bible's overwhelming
errors and corruptions are unanswerable! The Bible is corrupt no matter how you try to
decorate it.
The authors of the sites in the quotes above admit that the entire Bible is NOT perfect, and
contains man's corruption or alteration in it. They also admit that the original
manuscripts that came from GOD Almighty are lost. I'd like to comment on their points of
the type of errors that exist in the Bible today:
1-There is no evidence that the
errors are only limited to spelling of proper names and numbers. They're
only assuming this and are using it as fact. And even if this was true, then as they
openly admitted, this takes away the Bible's perfection. The reader must remember that
the Christians' entire polytheist trinity paganism comes
solely from conclusions and interpretations! There is not ONE SINGLE
claim or hard evidence in the Bible about GOD Almighty being 3, or that Jesus is our
Creator. Jesus who ran away from
King Herod to Egypt, and who begged GOD Almighty for Mercy and prostrated his face down to the
ground before Him on the night of crucifixion can not be the Creator of the Universe.
The trinitarian pagans would happily try to convince you that trinity is right from their
corrupted book, while at the same time, they openly admit that there are errors and man's
alterations that exist in the Bible, and the original manuscripts had been lost. If
the original manuscripts had been lost, then what makes you be so sure that trinity is the
correct conclusion?
2-According to
the Bible's theologians, no one even knows who wrote the copies that they're
referring to. In other words, we don't even know if these people were anointed from GOD
Almighty or not, because we don't have any evidence that the letters found that make up the
Bible today were officially written by men.
